Icon (Close Menu)

Some theses on ‘political theology’

Please email comments to letters@livingchurch.org.

1. Caesar is not an archetype.

2. Constantine is not an archetype.

3. Empire is not an archetype.

4. The state is not an archetype.

5. Combining all of these non-archetypes together will not produce an archetype which one might then set against “the lordship of Christ” (whatever this frequently pompous-sounding phrase might be taken to mean, as if all “political theologians” were actual forerunners of the eschaton).

6. What’s that? You aren’t an economist? Well then, why do you try so hard to sound like one?

7. And wait — there’s more? You also have no academic training whatsoever in economics — neither at the graduate level nor even at the undergraduate level? Well then, why do you write as if you do?

8. Theological study does not equip theologians to approach any other academic subject or field — for example, economics or political theory — from a privileged position.

9. All education requires toil. If a theologian wishes to write about economics (for example), then he or she must undertake the same toil as an economist, mastering the same body of knowledge according to the same academic standards. This applies to all other academic subjects and fields as well.

10. If theological education does not endeavor to teach according to these same standards, and if it does not require its students to adhere to these same standards, then it will degenerate into merest mechanical preaching.

11. Today, political protest is for people who want to hear themselves speak (or chant, or yell), as if complex issues might be oversimplified and reduced to nothing more than slogans. Thus protest today is not a form of political engagement but a form of political neglect — and, in extreme instances, political abuse.

12. The Christian is called to seek and embody far more than the activist’s will to power.

13. Learn to think historically and logically or you will not be able to think at all. Only small minds are impressed with big fat books animated by speculative theses and punctuated by esoteric terminology.

14. While perusing the tomes of knowledge, one should constantly hear an echo of the voice of God: “Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook, or press down its tongue with a cord?” (Job 41:1ff.)

15. If education does not produce a profound sense of one’s own finitude, then one deserves to hear only the judgment of God: “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?” (Job 38:2)

16. The context of theology is never the Academy (and never a culture, and never a polis) but always and only the Church in the world.

Benjamin M. Guyer, PhD is a Guest Writer. He is a lecturer in the Department of History and Philosophy at the University of Tennessee Martin. The author or editor of five books, Guyer is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, serves on the Advisory Board of Anglican & Episcopal History, and is Associate Book Review Editor for the Sixteenth Century Journal.

DAILY NEWSLETTER

Get Covenant every weekday:

MOST READ

Related Posts

The Forgotten Leg: Anglican Constitutionalism and the Church’s Call Today

The so-called Anglican method took shape within a moral and legal imagination formed by restraint, continuity, and ordered disagreement.

Learning to Long for Church Unity

Our experience of the church’s divisions, one felt acutely at the Eucharist, should inspire us to a hopeful longing for Jesus’ healing.

Dashed Hopes, Sobered Eyes, & the World as Given

In Paradise, one of Tolkien's characters says to another, things might have been different, but they could not have been better.

No Schadenfreude for the ACNA

If we are in Christ, can we ever be out of communion? In spite of real barriers, Christians are obligated to mutual recognition and love.