Icon (Close Menu)

Contra Washington: Ten Theses

Please email comments to letters@livingchurch.org.

Arecent resolution out of the Diocese of Washington has advocated genderless talk about God. This is not a new thought (though its association with gender neutrality is). In the wake of strong criticism, the bishop has replied that this resolution should be taken not politically but theologically. To honor this distinction, I offer the following theses.

1. God is not a creature, and hence is not male or female. God is beyond our knowing, and were we left to our own devices we could only project our notions upon him.

2. But God has revealed himself to us in Scripture and pre-eminently in Jesus Christ. In this light we can rightly understand how creation too reveals his glory.

3. Naming is different from describing. Jesus calls God “Abba,” and he is addressed as “my beloved Son.”

4. The official liturgies of the Church derive from this revelation and must make sure they address the true God truly.

5. As a result we are commanded directly by the risen Jesus to baptize in the name of the “Father and the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

6. In the relation thereby restored, we are given the space to describe God in many ways. Jesus described himself as a hen gathering her brood. The proper places for such descriptions include private prayers, poems, songs, and even sermons.

7. The question of how we address one another is a different one, dependent on custom, language, and usage. It should be debated separately.

8. The use of he for God is a linguistic accommodation to the Incarnation within the grammatical structures of English. It makes no metaphysical claim.

9. Male and female God created us. But these roles have been the subjects of great historical and cultural change, and are an appropriate topic of discussion.

10. For these reasons God should be addressed without exception or change in an orthodox manner in the worship of our Church, to his praise and glory.

The Rt. Rev. George Sumner, PhD served as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Dallas from 2015 to 2025. Ordained in Tanzania in 1981, he served in cross-cultural ministry in Navajoland, led parishes in New England, and from 1999-2015 was Principal of Wycliffe College, University of Toronto. He is the author or co-author of several books, including The First and The Last: The Claim of Jesus and The Claims of Other Religions (Eerdmans, 2004) and a commentary on Esther and Daniel (Brazos, 2013).

WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

Top headlines. Every Friday.

MOST READ

CLASSIFIEDS

Related Posts

Decently, and in Order

David Pitts loves the historic Christian liturgy, particularly as it has been received by the Episcopal Church. This love of corporate worship shines brightly on every page of his book.

Neuroscience in the Pews with Rod Wilson

What can we learn from neuroscience to explore questions in theology and ministry?

Mind the Gaps in Liturgy Studies

Those who teach liturgy will find some essays in this collection helpful for students, but they will need to be discerning in their selection.

Faithful to the Word

Michael Pasquarello wisely follows the life events of Bonhoeffer’s pastoral ministry in conjunction with the ways in which his theology of preaching evolved over time.