Icon (Close Menu)

Bp. Griswold on the Prayer Book

Please email comments to letters@livingchurch.org.

Ellen Johnston, program consultant for Virginia Theological Seminary’s Center for Liturgy and Music, writes about a consultation on revising the 1979 Book of Common Prayer:

The Most Rev. Frank Griswold opened with an address in which he submitted that the ethos of the 1979 BCP has not been fully integrated into the Episcopal Church making prayer book [revision] premature. The second plenary was given by the Rev. Dr. Lizette Larson Miller who contrasted the ecclesial and cultural differences between the era of the 1979 BCP’s creation and the present day.

… The Rev. Dr. John Baldovin summed up our topic well as he stated that “the utter centrality of the paschal mystery in our liturgies and a baptismal ecclesiology” were non-negotiable principles in considering liturgical revision.

Read the rest.

Matthew Townsend is a Halifax-based freelance journalist and volunteer advocate for survivors of sexual misconduct in Anglican settings. He served as editor of the Anglican Journal from 2019 to 2021 and communications missioner for the Anglican Diocese of Quebec from 2019 to 2022. He and his wife recently entered catechism class in the Orthodox Church in America.

WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

Top headlines. Every Friday.

MOST READ

CLASSIFIEDS

Related Posts

Louis Weil, 86: Liturgist, Theologian, Professor, Ecumenist

Weil played a major role in the 1979 revision of the Book of Common Prayer.

Website Provides Guide to Resources on Prayer Book Revision

An effort to guide discussions on a topic that has endured for centuries.

Jubilate: A Conference on Prayer Book Revision and Language

A thoughtful discussion, intended to equip the church to talk openly and with theological rigor about our common prayer.

Robust Conversation on Prayer Book Revision

The essays collectively provide a careful reflection on where we are as a church with the current 1979 Book of Common Prayer. The assumption is that if we are to talk about revision, we must first recognize the revolution of the liturgical movement, and second, ask if we as a church have actually lived into its vision.