Icon (Close Menu)

Discerning New Anglican Identities in the Anglican Church of Kenya

By Joseph Wandera

Decades of conflict within the global Anglican family are contributing to shifting Anglican identities.

A recent virtual meeting of the Anglican Church of Kenya’s House of Bishops “noted with concern the Church of England’s departure from the traditional Christian teachings on marriage.”

It also took note of the LGBTQ movement in Kenya, arising from a February decision by the Supreme Court of Kenya to allow the registration of a gay lobby group.

Consequently, the House of Bishops has established a working committee of four bishops to:

  • Seek to strengthen ties with associations and movements such as the Global Anglican Future Conference, the Council of Anglican Provinces of Africa, and the Global South Fellowship of Churches, which are of like mind with ACK in matters of faith and doctrine.
  • Develop a position paper on how to relate to churches and/or provinces that have departed from traditional Christian teachings, but without relinquishing our rightful place in the Communion.
  • Develop a position paper to guide the ACK’s response to LGBTQ issues with clear theological, biblical, sociological, psychological, and cultural bases.

The vast majority of Anglicans and even non-Christians in Kenya are shocked at the recent developments in our mother Church of England in allowing the blessing of same-sex relations.

The response of the church’s leadership and the country’s other leaders — including President William Ruto to the Supreme Court’s ruling — has been unequivocal in its condemnation.

While the ACK is an autonomous province, its filial affinity to the Church of England has been unassailable. Both old and young Anglicans identify with the Church of England, with a deep sense of gratitude for the Church of England’s mission in the past. Many Anglican dioceses in Kenya are in varied partnerships with dioceses in the Church of England, and other members of the Anglican Communion. Most desire to remain in communion.

The terms of reference for the bishops’ working committee clearly express this desire to remain in the Anglican Communion.

Yet, in the face of recent developments in the Church of England, this historical relationship is challenged. It is far from a “stable self with a package of unchanging values,” but rather is continually in transition.

In Kenya’s multireligious and multicultural context, the debate has taken an interfaith and intrafaith dimension: Anglican Christians are in dialogue with one another, but also engaged with members of other religious traditions, such as Muslims and African indigenous religions.

At a recent open-air thanksgiving public church service attended by hundreds of Anglicans and non-Christians in the Diocese of Katakwa in western Kenya, which I attended, a Muslim imam lauded Archbishop Jackson Ole Sapit for his strong condemnation of blessing same-sex relations. The governor for Busia County, Paul Otuoma — a Roman Catholic — similarly criticized pro-gay movements, saying that they contravened African culture and God’s laws of nature.

Lambeth Resolution I.10 on Human Sexuality recognized the existence of “persons who experience themselves as having a homosexual orientation,” seeking pastoral care within the Church.

While there are strong voices in the Church in defense of its traditional teaching on sexuality and marriage, unlike developments in the West, there is a deafening silence, even resistance, against any pastoral provisions for those who may be in same-sex relations. Because of the community stigma associated with same-sex relations, those in the Church who have some pastoral concerns choose to remain silent.

Our cultural situation is complex, as a few episodes can illustrate. In 2019, an LGTBQ activist planted a flag on Mount Kenya, Kenya’s highest mountain, and the second-highest mountain in Africa, after Kilimanjaro. The activist did this, ostensibly, to give symbolic voice to gay issues in Kenya.

Under the banner Booi wa Kirira kia Mugikuyu, loosely translated as “the convention for Gikuyu culture,” a rival group mobilized funds to scale the mountain and remove the flag. This group also performed Gikuyu indigenous cleansing rites, led by the tribe’s elders. The Gikuyu are Kenya’s largest ethnic community.

On January 6, Edwin Kiprotich Chiloba, a gay-rights activist, was found dead. Police reported that he had been strangled and his body stuffed in a metal box. As of now it is unclear whether there is a connection between his sexuality and his murder, but it has been suggested.

The bishops’ working group, and indeed the entire leadership of the church, ought to seriously and prayerfully consider pastoral interventions for violations of every kind to a section of the household of God, as part of our Christian vocation.

In Kenya, the debate is not just among Anglicans or even Christians. It concerns members of other faiths and government. The debate shapes how Anglicans are perceived and relate with members of other faith traditions.

The Diocese of Mumias, where I serve as bishop, is located in a region with some of the oldest presence of Islam in Kenya’s interior. Muslims are our neighbors in our daily interactions, and mosques dot our landscape. What happens in the Anglican Community, directly or indirectly, affects our relations.

Religious and cultural pluralism continue to be important in the political discourse on the LGTBQ community.

In all cases, one can see how agency plays out by both Christians and non-Christians, the community, and cultural activists.

Clearly, the Anglican Church of Kenya desires to retain its membership within the Anglican Communion, as expressed in the terms of reference during the House of Bishops’ meeting. However, in this continued belonging, the ACK is also clear that it will “maintain its inherited doctrine on marriage.” In reinforcing this position, the ACK seeks to associate more and more with like-minded associations.

From the drafting of the terms of reference for the bishops’ working group, I see some clear contours emerging. First, I envision a growing relationship of differentiation in the ACK’s relationship with the wider Anglican Communion. This differentiation may be seen as a calling in the present circumstances. Yet this emerging differentiation seeks to maintain, with gratitude, cherished historical links to the wider Anglican family.

Second, the discernment process could be seen as a statement against powerful homogenizing tendencies, currently emerging from within and without the church but also increasingly appropriated locally.

Finally, the debate illustrates how people and groups behave and construct their identities, demanding an opportunity to thrive without disconnecting from the global family.

The decision by the House of Bishops to seek clarity on how it will relate within the larger Anglican Communion is part of this continuing journey to seek creative responses on shifting Anglican identities in a rapidly transforming global cultural context.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Very timely reflections Bishop!! I hope that the working groups of the Bishops of ACK will consider listening to multiple voices on the three thematic issues. My humble suggestion is that the the two position papers be based on dialogue between institutional culture of the church and everyday theologies of the issues at hand. Invisibilizing the later will lead us to the most obvious conclusions. I am also looking forward to a clear definition of pastoral care or pastoral accompaniment for LGBT folks. Maybe it is time we conceptualize this pastoral accompaniment not as conversation therapy or ‘rehabilitation’ but healing of wounds, healing the broken hearted, and healing of relationships. The conversation should also begin from a point of view that ‘it is in here’ rather than ‘it is out there.’ I am looking forward to the outcomes of the working groups. Thank you for this piece.

  2. Instead of telling LGBT people what NOT to do, I suggest telling them what would be an acceptable way for them to live their lives.

    The Bible tells us that it is not good for man to live alone.  What, then, is an LGBT person to do?  For a person whose romantic interest is limited to the same sex, marriage to someone of the opposite sex would not work well.  In fact some do marry someone of the opposite sex hoping that it would make it possible to change.  Social attitudes cause that to happen because no one wants to be a social pariah.  As near as I can tell, that does not work out well.  Probably no parent would want a daughter to marry a gay man who is using her in an attempt to change.

    Would it be reasonable for an LGBT person to marry someone of the opposite sex but have separate bedrooms?  Would it be reasonable to share, without being married, a residence with someone of the opposite sex and have separate bedrooms?  Would sharing a residence with someone of the same sex be acceptable if they promised to be celibate?  Should all LGBT persons simply live alone?  Would living alone subject them to suspicion?

    Again, instead of saying, “Don’t, don’t, don’t”, I strongly suggest providing acceptable and realistic alternatives.

     

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

DAILY NEWSLETTER

Get Covenant every weekday:

MOST READ

Most Recent

A Ministry of Christlike Service

A sermon for the ordination of deacons, given at Christ Church Cathedral, Nashville, Tennessee, June 1, 2024 Today is...

Only One Future

The story of the Episcopal Church in the modern era is usually reckoned in terms of presiding episcopates,...

At the Heart of All Being

Christ the Logos of Creation: An Essay in Analogical Metaphysics By John Betz Emmaus Academic, 592 pages, $59.95 In this ambitious work,...

What are the Liberal Arts For? The Case of Tom Ripley

Spoilers for Netflix’s Ripley and the Book of Job The liberal arts seem neverendingly threatened, most recently at small...